PDA

View Full Version : Biggger is better small is useless.



oedi
07-02-2011, 05:43 AM
So who dare running small gladiators, and who got the biggest guy out there?

I run a size 48 defensive theatrics guy.

I run a size 90 offensive theatrics guy.

eternal shadow
07-05-2011, 09:17 AM
Being big isnt that good, it means you lose out on agilty and lots of other things.

Dehodem
07-05-2011, 09:29 AM
Being big isnt that good, it means you lose out on agilty and lots of other things.

Not tru,

You can have godly stats and not suffer from any less stats on big glads. I have a godly one on stats and he is big.

Also i never saw any advantage (more parry or conter- attack) on small vs big one.

Small is totaly useless (small= having BAD stat on height tha all)

oedi
07-05-2011, 10:18 AM
Being small only has disadvantages, and no benefits. Less carry, less hp, less damage. No bonus to defense as I think would be natural.
Being large has all the advantages, and no penalties in defense or getting high numbers in the other stats.
my size 90 started out like this: 57-67-64-73-90-74-67, hes currently 91-39-8.

Dehodem
07-05-2011, 10:32 AM
Yea not bad at all (specialy if a tank whitch i doubt knowing u),

mine are all around 80 (highest 83) and i have a godly one (my main) : 72-83-72-73-72-59-61, currently 27-1-4 (i am new)
All other are 80+ height and between 75-80 agi with 72+ in stam and 2 other stats at 70 at least.

oedi
07-17-2011, 03:01 AM
Had to let my size 48 go today. Got a new slave that I couldnt pass, and size 48 just aint good enough. He ended his career with 146-109-6 record.

Arkham
07-17-2011, 02:02 PM
Below average toons are supposed to get a defensive bonus. I just don't know what below average is. I rarely see a stat below the 50s.